With contributions from Will Lounsbury
Governor Reynolds signed a bill this week altering and clarifying the amount of damages a claimant may recover for medical expenses in a personal injury lawsuit.
This new law remedies confusion that had arisen over time between attorneys representing both plaintiffs and defendants regarding the calculation of recoverable damages under the Iowa Supreme Court case, Pexa v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.
Evidence of Medical Expenses
Under the new law, evidence offered to prove past medical expenses is limited to the following:
- amounts actually paid to satisfy medical bills, regardless of payment source; and
- amounts actually necessary to pay bills incurred that have not yet been paid. This cannot exceed the amount that could be satisfied by utilizing the claimant’s health insurance, regardless of whether such insurance is, or will be, used to satisfy the bills.
There is no affirmative duty on any party to seek a reduction in billed charges if the party is not contractually allowed to do so.
Recoverable Damages for Medical Expenses
In personal injury actions, a claimant’s recoverable damages may not exceed the sum of the amounts actually paid by or on behalf of the claimant to health care providers, as well as any amount actually necessary to satisfy medical care charges incurred but not yet paid. Notably, this new law does not apply to medical malpractice actions.
Unlike the recoverable damages addressed in Pexa, this legislation does not require qualified expert witness testimony to validate any unpaid bills for care as “reasonable and necessary” for the costs to be recoverable. Instead, medical care charges that have been incurred but remain unpaid are recoverable up to the amount actually necessary to satisfy the bill.
This law comes into play when litigation is in progress and damages need to be analyzed.
Davis Brown Law Firm blogs, legal updates, and other content are for educational and informational purposes only. This is not legal advice and it does not create an attorney/client relationship between Davis Brown and readers. Each circumstance is different; readers should consult an attorney to understand how this content relates to their personal situation. You should not use Davis Brown blogs or content as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state. Reproduction of Davis Brown content without written consent is prohibited.